Monday, November 23, 2009

Call of Duty Has Gone Too Far: How Our Children Are Being Programed Right Before Our Very Eyes

James Green
The Info Revolution

This is one of the more disturbing things I have seen in a while. To think of the way that our society is programmed and conditioned is becoming sickening. How our children are manipulated into believing that certain things are normal when most of us would be outraged if we stopped and paid attention.  Of course that’s the key, if we paid attention.  We live in a time when we are forced to not trust; a time when toys or games can be used to form ideals not just entertain. Face it, you could probably go on all day long about how messed up it is that propaganda and social programming rules our lives on a daily basis. It’s a constant that most don't see, let alone understand. When those of us, who have seen through the smoke and mirrors, truly get an understanding of what is going on, only then do we see how disturbing so many things have become.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, one of the most popular games of the year was released last week.  Many people rushed to stores at midnight the day of its release to be one of the first to check it out. I have to admit, graphics are great and the game play looks pretty real.  Some of my friends say its one of the best games they have ever played.  And no, I am not upset about the violence, shooting people has been apart of the gaming world forever now, like it or not, our kids shoot people in video games. It’s on us to teach them that it’s only a game, or do the unimaginable and not let them play it at all.  So what's the deal?  Why such a grand lead in?  Modern Warfare 2 has a controversial level that even gives the option to skip over it two separate times. (Watch video below to see the whole level) The level is set up in an airport, and you have infiltrated a terrorist group and you are earning their trust. Your objective is to kill every civilian in the airport then get out while sending some sort of a message by doing so. Unarmed, people in an airport, hands in the air and running for their lives, being shot down like they are in some sick parallel scenario of a Columbine or Fort Hood. That’s pretty messed up folks, to think your kids are playing a game that makes it "cool" to play the forbidden level. I can see it now, 10 year old kids telling their parents they are going over to Bobby's house after school to play, when the whole thing is orchestrated just to play this game before Bobby's older brother gets home from his (insert after school activity here). But that’s not the worst part, it gets worse then just killing defenseless people.  The idea that is forced on your kids in this level is this: You are a double agent fighting terror, therefore you must join up with other terrorists to commit acts of violence such as killing everyone in an airport for the sake of the war on terror or for national security. It actually asks you to kill innocent people for the betterment of the fight against terror. Yeah, killing people is fine, just as long as you have a really good reason Bobby!  Sometimes we need to kill the good innocent people to catch the bad guys and that’s just fine, I mean you don't want Bin Laden to come to your house and kill you and your family, do you Bobby?  Then pick up that fully automatic assault rifle and start shooting, because that’s the way we do it in America, and it’s the only way to keep us safe from the boogieman! That’s the only way we can save America!  

Ok, so that’s a little much right?  Wrong, that is the message that is being sent to our youth.  You have to understand that it’s done over and over again too.  Movies, kids shows, prime time TV, and commercials (well commercials are kind of supposed to do this and at least we expect it more).  The Fox network and others have just announced last month that the U.S. Government will be using fall television programming to send messages to the American people about climate change and government service.  So our loving government is now openly announcing that they push their agenda on the American people through popular TV shows.  I will resist the chance, or at least not go into great detail about it, to point out how our tax dollars go to use against us over and over again. 

So if that’s what we know about, then what don't we know?  How far have they really taken it?  Just watch Alex Jones' new film, Fall of The Republic, to see how television has been used for mind control for years. (Clip below)  To understand how our memories can be changed though the images in our mind being slightly altered is amazing.  By altering these images, we can then be manipulated into thinking and remembering differently. It’s really not too hard to believe if you give it just a little thought.   

We need to understand what is going on, inform ourselves, and stop mindlessly staring at television sets. Let me paint a hypothetical picture for you; this will sound far fetched at first but that’s the point.  Try to imagine you wanted to make someone believe, lets say, that paper was made from old Christmas ornaments and every other form of paper production was toxic.  I know that most people will stare at their televisions for hours a day, so this becomes an obvious avenue for information.  I would then figure out a way to tell people in the shows you watch and through the news that non-toxic paper is running out to create a social awareness.  Then I show in another show that someone is gathering Christmas ornaments to take to the ornament-recycling center to make paper.  I make that person out to be a responsible good person who is doing the right thing, someone that everyone likes, and has great hair.  Without even trying I have already put into the minds of the people watching this that the paper supply is low and the only way to save the paper supply is to take your Christmas ornaments to be recycled.  Well after getting the idea out there, I have decided to bring it up a notch.  Now I will make a show that has someone putting up old ornaments for Christmas and how the whole neighborhood is appalled.  Now the culture has changed to adapt the new idea, and people who are uneducated on the subject use this social programming as a learning tool.  They then begin to enforce this idea, and spread the message to others because of the fake social responsibility that has been created though the media.  As disturbing as it sounds, people really do use television shows and movies to educate themselves. These are merely illustrations on how media and pop-culture demonize people for doing something seemingly harmless and promote a new idea at the same time. Now without telling you why, you have been conditioned.  Little do you know, this whole time, I own all the new "safe" paper companies and new ornament companies where you will replace the old ones, the recycling centers, and at the same time, I have driven my competitors out of business and probably got some kind of government incentive to run the program.  All with propaganda and the fact that you cant get enough CSI.

Propaganda is truly everywhere you look.  If you spend any time at all looking around, you will find more then you could ever imagine. This has been going on forever, and it just keeps getting worse.  Call of duty, makes me even more concerned though because of the life like terror ideals.  With so many questions around 9-11, and many pointing to U.S. involvement, would it be totally off to think our military and government would do something like that?  When video games show our military teaming up with terrorists to kill an airport full of people just to what? Get in with them more to prove some false loyalty? As if there is something more important out there you would be saving your cover for.  Obviously saving an airport full of innocent people isn’t enough.  At the end of the level the real terrorists kill the character the gamer is playing because they know he is a spy or double agent anyways. Even after shooting down hundreds if not thousands with an assault riffle, “you still get killed every time,” one gamer told me when researching the game. When you have a government that has time and time again been caught with its hand in the cookie jar, how could this not be disturbing.  The Obama administration is no different then Bush, if not worse.  Same plans, same agenda, just like the administration before that, and the trend has continued for quite some time now.  For instance, when you look into Operation Northwoods, and see that our government has had plans for false flag terror you start to see the picture that maybe things are not so black and white.  Maybe it isn’t as clear as “red blooded American” vs. “Terrorist.” When we have plans to attack the American people, on our soil, just to start a war with someone else it makes the possibilities endless.  Lets hope the last part of the games trailer that shows Washington DC burning down in flames with several dead just lying on the ground isn't some sick preview of what's to come. The Globalist Elite do have a sick need to announce several things before they happen; only to have the media act like it was never said in the first place. To see this and understand it is to know you cannot trust and believe in a government that has these kinds of thoughts and ideas.  And for those of you who would point out that the government didn't make this video game so why would I suggest that they have something to do with it or the games message, understand that if they had a problem with it, it would not have been in the game in the first place.  The military recruits video gamers and trains with xbox and wii controlers now to ease transition from the games on the market to the actual weapons system controls that they use today.  So many things seem to link together, and in this day and age it is hard not to connect the dots.

Just pay attention because it’s all around you.  For your sake and your kids, you need to be aware of what kind of world is out there and what we are moving towards. Its time we stop living in our bubbles, and stop being unaware of what is going on with our television sets and video game consoles. We don't have the luxury of being uninformed anymore, that time has passed as a new world is been laid before us.  Things are about to change on a global scale, and just so you don't wake up one day and not know where you are, you better start paying attention.

Alex Jones TV: Doom & Gloom Climate Fraudsters Exposed

On the Sunday edition of the Alex Jones Show, the hacked CRU documents and the victory this represents for the truth and the ongoing effort to defeat the New World Order. The documents reveal how scientists working for the globalists one-world government effort falsified data to push the climate change scam. In addition to faking global temperature data, the outed scientists engaged in a coordinated campaign to ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using cronyism to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests.

You've Got To See This! Global Warming Is Proved a Fraud by Hackers

  • Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes23 Nov 2009 | 6:41 am Infowars

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Monday, November 23, 2009
    Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes 231109top
    Calls for an independent inquiry into what is being dubbed “Climategate” are growing as the foundation for man-made global warming implodes following the release of emails which prove researchers colluded to manipulate data in order to “hide the decline” in global temperatures.
    Former British chancellor Lord Lawson was the latest to demand an impartial investigation be launched into the scandal, which arrives just weeks before the UN climate conference in Copenhagen. “They should set up a public inquiry under someone who is totally respected and get to the truth,” he told the BBC Radio Four Today programme.
    The emails were leaked at the end of last week after hackers penetrated the servers of the Climatic Research Unit, which is based at the University of East Anglia, in eastern EnglandThe CRU is described as one of the leading climate research bodies in the world.
    The hacked documents and communications reveal how top scientists conspired to falsify data in the face of declining global temperatures in order to prop up the premise that man-made factors are driving climate change. Others illustrate how they embarked on a venomous and coordinated campaign to ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using cronyism to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests.
    As expected, the establishment media has gone into whitewash overdrive, characterizing the emails as evidence of “rancor” amongst the climate community and focusing on some of the lesser emails while ignoring the true significance of what has been revealed.
    Organizations with close ties to the CRU have engaged in psychological terrorism by fearmongering about the planet with doomsday scenarios, illustrating their argument with outlandish propaganda animation videos which show pets drowning and others that show computer-generated polar bears crashing to earth in a throwback to 9/11 victims jumping from the towers, when in reality polar bear population figures are thriving.
    “One of the emails under scrutiny, written by Phil Jones, the centre’s director, in 1999, reads: “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline,” reports the London Telegraph.
    The author admitted to the Associated Press that the e mail was genuine.
    In another example, researchers discuss data that is “artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures”. Apparently, the “real temperatures” are whatever global warming cheerleaders want them to be.
    As Anthony Watts writes, attempts to claim e mails are “out of context,” as the defense has been from CRU, cannot apply in this instance.
    You can claim an email you wrote years ago isn’t accurate saying it was “taken out of context”, but a programmer making notes in the code does so that he/she can document what the code is actually doing at that stage, so that anyone who looks at it later can figure out why this function doesn’t plot past 1960. In this case, it is not allowing all of the temperature data to be plotted. Growing season data (summer months when the new tree rings are formed) past 1960 is thrown out because “these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures”, which implies some post processing routine.
    Spin that, spin it to the moon if you want. I’ll believe programmer notes over the word of somebody who stands to gain from suggesting there’s nothing “untowards” about it.
    Either the data tells the story of nature or it does not. Data that has been “artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures” is false data, yielding a false result.
    Another email discusses changing temperature data to fix “blips” in studies so as to make them conform with expectations, which of course is the cardinal sin of scientific research.
    “Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more” was revealed in the 61 megabites of confidential files released on the Internet for anyone to read, writes Andrew Bolt.
      Another email appears to celebrate the death of climate change skeptic John L Daly, with the words, “In an odd way this is cheering news.”
      In another communication, the author expresses his fantasy to “beat the crap out of” climate change skeptics.
      In another exchange, researchers appear to discuss ways to discredit James Saiers of the Geophysical Research Letters journal, by means of an academic witch hunt, because of his sympathies with climate change skeptics.
      “If you think that Saiers is in the greenhouse skeptics camp, then, if we can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official AGU channels to get him ousted.”
      Other emails express doubt about whether the world is really heating up and infer that data needs to be reinterpreted.
      “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.”
      Scientists discuss trying to disguise historical data that contradicts the man-made climate change thesis, such as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), which must be ‘contained’ according to one email.
      Suppression of evidence is also discussed, with scientists resolving to delete embarrassing emails.
      “And, perhaps most reprehensibly,” writes James Delingpole, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.”
      “This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”
      “I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice!”
      Scientists also “discussed ways of dodging Freedom of Information Act requests to release temperature data,” reports the Daily Mail.
      The emails show that scientists relied on cronyism and cosying up to FOIA officials to prevent them from being forced to release data.
      “When the FOI requests began here, the FOI person said we had to abide by the requests,’ the email says. “It took a couple of half-hour sessions to convince them otherwise.”
      “Once they became aware of the types of people we were dealing with, everyone at UEA became very supportive. I’ve got to know the FOI person quite well and the chief librarian – who deals with appeals.”
      It is important to stress that this compendium merely scratches the surface of the monumental levels of fraud that have been exposed as a result of the hacked emails.
      People will look back on this moment as the beginning of the end for global warming alarmism and the agenda to implement draconian measures of regulation and control along with the levy of a global carbon tax.
      Many more revelations will be forthcoming as a result of this leak, and the desperate effort on behalf of the establishment to whitewash the whole issue will only end up making the damage worse.

    • Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!22 Nov 2009 | 3:49 pm Infowars

      Alan Caruba
      Warning Signs
      November 22, 2009
      For those of us “skeptics” and “deniers” who have been jumping up and down, pointing at the Sun, and saying, “See, it’s the Sun that determines how warm or cool the Earth is. See it? Up there in the sky?” The truth about some of the scientists behind the global warming hoax has finally arrived.
      featured stories   Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!
      featured stories   Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!featured stories   Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!
      Now that Hadley CRU and its conspirators have been exposed, there truly is no need to hold a December UN climate change conference in Copenhagen.
      The hoax has its roots in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an instrument of the United Nations Environmental Program, for whom global warming was the open sesame to achieving a one-world-government by scaring nations into signing a treaty that would control their use of energy, the means of producing it, and require vast billions to be sent to less developed nations in exchange for “emitting” greenhouse gases.
      Energy is called “the master resource” because, if you have lots of it, you can call your own shots. If you don’t, you are condemned to live in the dark and keeping people in the dark about the global warming hoax was essential.
      For years the IPCC has been controlled by a handful of the worst liars in the world, utterly devoted to taking actual climate data and twisting it to confirm the assertion that the Earth was not only warming dramatically, but that humanity was in peril of rising oceans, melting glaciers and polar ice caps, more hurricanes, the die-off of countless animal species, and every other calamity that could possibly be attributed to “global warming”, including acne.
      So, around November 20, when some enterprising individual hacked into the computers of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU), making off with thousands of emails and documents that demonstrate the level of collusion and deception being practiced by its scientists.
      It’s a climate hoax expose that some are calling the revelations a “little blue dress” while others are comparing it to the Pentagon Papers. It has also been dubbed “climategate.”
      As James Delingpole wrote in the Telegraph, one of England’s leading newspapers, “Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more” was revealed in the 61 megabites of confidential files released on the Internet for anyone to read.

        The conspirators had a visceral hatred for scientists who challenged their phony statistics and climate data, but they also agonized over the difficulties of hiding a long established climate cycle such as the Medieval Warm Period. At one point it was left out of a graph that famously became known as “the hockey stick” because it depicted a ludicrous sudden rise in warming, ignoring the previous natural cycle.

        At the heart of the revelations were the intense efforts to ensure that no legitimate scientist, particularly those dissenting from the various IPCC reports, would be allowed to participate in the peer review process. Peer review is an essential element in science as it permits other scientists to examine and test the data being put forth to substantiate a new interpretation or discovery.
        The IPCC reports were the basis by which popular media such as National Geographic, Time and Newsweek magazines could spread the lies about a dramatic “global warming”, passing them off to an unsuspecting and scientifically illiterate general public. At the same time, the lies were integrated them into school curriculums and maintained by Hollywood celebrities, politicians and others, duped or deliberately ignorant.
        To this day, otherwise legitimate news media outlets continue to trumpet and repeat absolute nonsense about “global warming” like brain-dead parrots.
        Now that Hadley CRU and its conspirators have been exposed, there truly is no need to hold a December UN climate change conference in Copenhagen; one in which nations would be required to put limits on “greenhouse gas emissions” even though such gases, primarily carbon dioxide, have nothing to do with altering the Earth’s climate.
        And that is why you are going to hear more about “climate change” and far less about “global warming.” Hidden in such discussions, intended to justify legislation and regulation, is that the Earth’s climate has always and will always change.
        It is, for example, shameful and deceitful for the EPA to claim carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” that should be regulated. The same applies to “cap-and-trade” legislation with the same purpose.
        Billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on studies of global warming and poured into agencies such as NASA that have lent credence to the global warming hoax.
        “The U.S. taxpayer has much exposure here in the joint projects and collaborations which operated in reliance upon what the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit was doing,” says Christopher C. Horner, a longtime global warming skeptic. “There are U.S. taxpayer-funded offices and individuals involved in the machinations addressed in the emails, and in the emails themselves.”
        Horner, the author of “Red Hot Lies”, said that the initial revelations “give the appearance of a conspiracy to defraud, by parties working in taxpayer funded agencies collaborating on ways to misrepresent material on which an awful lot of taxpayer money rides.”
        The climate, defined as long term trends, and the weather has nothing whatever to do with human activity and suggesting it does reveals the depth of contempt that people like Al Gore and his ilk have for humanity and those fleeced by purchasing “carbon credits” or paying more for electricity when their utility does.
        The East Anglia CRU charlatans have been exposed. Most certainly, the United Nations IPCC should be disbanded in disgrace. It belongs in a museum of hoaxes right beside the Piltdown Man and the Loch Ness Monster.

      • Where the Global Warming Hoax Was Born22 Nov 2009 | 3:18 pm Infowars

        Marjorie Mazel Hecht
        November 22, 2009

          “Global Warming” is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world’s population. The preposterous claim that human-produced carbon dioxide will broil the Earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life, came out of a 1975 conference in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, organized by the influential anthropologist Margaret Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in 1974.

          Mead—whose 1928 book on the sex life of South Pacific Islanders was later found to be a fraud—recruited like-minded anti-population hoaxsters to the cause: Sow enough fear of mancaused climate change to force global cutbacks in industrial activity and halt Third World development. Mead’s leading recruits at the 1975 conference were climate scare artist Stephen Schneider, population-freak biologist George Woodwell, and the current AAAS president John Holdren—all three of them disciples of Malthusian fanatic Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb.

        • Search the CRU Climate Fraud Emails by Keyword22 Nov 2009 | 3:06 pm Infowars

          An Elegant Chaos
          November 22, 2009
          Editor’s note: The link below points to a page with a form to search the CRU emails by keyword.
          On 20 November 2009, emails and other documents, apparently originating from with the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia.
          If real, these emails contain some quite surprising and even disappointing insights into what has been happening within the climate change scientific establishment. Worryingly this same group of scientists are very influential in terms of economic and social policy formation around the subject of climate change.
          As these emails are already in the public domain, I think it is important that people are able to look through them and judge for themselves. Until I am told otherwise I have no reason to think the text found on this site is true or false. As of today, Saturday 21 November, there have been no statements that I have seen doubting the authenticity of these texts. It is here just as a curiosity!

        • Hacked E Mails Show Blatant Climate Change Fraud22 Nov 2009 | 2:46 pm Infowars

          The Wall Street Journal
          November 22, 2009

            The picture that emerges of prominent climate-change scientists from the more than 3,000 documents and emails accessed by hackers and put on the Internet this week is one of professional backbiting and questionable scientific practices. It could undermine the idea that the science of man-made global warming is entirely settled just weeks before a crucial climate-change summit.

            Researchers at the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, England, were victims of a cyberattack by hackers sometime Thursday. A collection of emails dating back to the mid-1990s as well as scientific documents were splashed across the Internet. University officials confirmed the hacker attack, but couldn’t immediately confirm the authenticity of all the documents posted on the Internet.
            The publicly posted material includes years of correspondence among leading climate researchers, most of whom participate in the preparation of climate-change reports for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the authoritative summaries of global climate science that influence policy makers around the world.

          • Climatic Research Unit Hacked E Mails & Data22 Nov 2009 | 1:58 pm Infowars

            Sunday, November 22, 2009
            This archive presents over 120Mb of emails, documents, computer code and models from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, written between 1996 and 2009.
            The CRU has told the BBC that the files were obtained by a computer hacker 3-4 days ago.
            This archive includes unreleased global temperature analysis computer source code that has been the subject of Freedom of Information Act requests.
            The archive appears to be a collection of information put together by the CRU prior to a FoI redaction process.
            fastest (Sweden)current siteslow (US)FinlandNetherlandsPolandTongaEuropeSSLTor

          • India challenges Western data linking climate change, Himalayan melt22 Nov 2009 | 10:14 am Infowars

            Rama Lakshmi
            Washington Post
            November 22, 2009

              NEW DELHI — As countries around the world prepare to flex their negotiating muscles at next month’s climate-change summit in Copenhagen, India has begun to question the Western model of computing global warming statistics.

              Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh released a report last week that says there is no conclusive evidence that climate change has caused the melting of the Himalayan glaciers. The report says that not all of the glaciers are receding at alarming rates and that a few are even advancing.
              The report, an analysis of data from the past four decades, is part of India’s efforts to produce a body of indigenous research assessments on the subject.
              “So far, we have been depending on research conducted by the West on what is happening to our glaciers and environment,” he said after releasing the report, which was prepared by a former scientist with the Geological Survey of India and included a disclaimer that it did not necessarily reflect the government’s view.